Re-vamping Incentivise Design around the permissionless Rating Process

**Summary Session 2b) :

Attendee’s:

Planned Agenda:

  1. Shared Review Miro board - finalise Problem Identification [Partially Achieved]

  2. Decide the following for “Root Cause” : [Not Achieved]

  • if we want empirical validation
    • if yes, a concrete action plan (when, where, how, who, why) to provide empirical validation
  • which should be addressed with the re-design of the incentive structure
  1. Optional: Breakdown of potential solution into a Hypothesis tree [Not Achieved]

  2. Stakeholder mapping and their incentives in relation to selected root causes. Tools that may prove useful: [Not Achieved]

  • Entity Relationship diagram
  • Causal loop
  • Empathy map
  • an adaption of token utility canvas

Summary of the session:

  • Brief Review of the issues in PRR
  • Initial stakeholder mapping

Recording of the session:

Task for session 3c):

  • Everyone: Ensure Stakeholder maps are complete
  • Everyone: Add Stakeholder
  • Everyone: (optional) Map systems
  • Everyone: (optional) Map mechanism

Feel free to make a workspace fro yourself in the miroboard!

Resources: Problem PRR - Google Sheets

1 Like

Summary Session 3a)

Attendee’s: Xindaneran, Dabar90, Salome, OriginalSK Lavi, xm3van

Planned Agenda:

  1. Session Goal (5 min)
  2. Review of Token utility Canvas for 3 Main Stakeholder Group (15min)
  3. Mechanism and System design (40 min) [Not achieved]

Summary of the session:

  • Review of Goal for the session / stage
  • Stakeholder map and review of token utility canvas

Recording of the session:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hnxidXqT-NM-lO84FbthM4duXOZ_xfi3/view?usp=sharing

Task for session 3b):

  • Everyone: Add to missing information in a different colour from the token utility canvas
  • Everyone: Map mechanism & Map systems using entity relationship diagrams
1 Like

Summary Session 3b)

Attendee’s: Dabar90, xm3van

Planned Agenda:
1, Review of Token utility Canvas for 3 Main Stakeholder Group
2. Mechanism and System design

Summary of the session:

  • Very free discussion
  • Review of Stakeholder map
  • Entity-relationship diagram
  • Comment: Might require re-scheduling!

Recording of the session:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O_8yWxXFymyGQ58Rp0wTpoYBzRvBHwrI/view?usp=sharing

Task for session 4a):

  • Everyone: Map mechanism & Map systems using entity relationship diagrams
1 Like

An explanation for the absence of summaries - given the current circumstances the team needed to re-focus priorities and holiday season of community and contributors led to less attendance. Hence we shifted to a more show-and-share approach where the system is designed and shared with the community.

2 Likes

Summary Session

Attendee’s: Dabar90, Lavi, Luuk, Salome, Jan-Lucas, xm3van ( + 2 more)

Planned Agenda:

  1. Presentation of the initial system

Summary of the session:

  • Covered 1,2, 4
  • some discussion especially around reviewer

Recording of the session:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bYd5Hd48MwqaxGxxh_5nVQd2jD-dIMTX/view?usp=sharing

Task for finalisation:

  • Make light paper circulation ready to share with forum and network
    → Implement a tl;dr
    → Emphasise tokenholder rights
    → Fix Reviewer role

  • Address token utility for each Token

  • Prepare forum post

  • Finalise missing point planned for session 5 in the initial work plan

2 Likes